“I used to win 99% of my games as monster, these days I win 75% of my games as monster. The game is definitely unbalanced in favour of hunters though.”
See how silly that sounds when written down?
The telemetry data shows us that monsters win more than the hunters do in level 40+ games. Our group plays custom games with no elite wildlife buffs, monsters still win more than hunters do.
If you won literally 50% of your games as monster, then the game is perfectly balanced. If you are winning 70%+ of your games as monster then how can you with a straight face jump onto the forums and complain that the hunters are too strong?
P.s. I play both hunter and monster, monster is my favourite. Good monsters still wreck good teams, good teams can still wreck good monsters.
TL:DR - stop moaning and L2P. Cheese and rice…
(This isn’t aimed at any one person, I’m just tired of seeing “Hi there, Scissors are overpowered, yours truly, Paper” type threads - EVEN THOUGH THE TELEMETRY DATA QUITE LITERALLY PROVES OTHERWISE.)